0:00
This is going to be part two of a talk I
0:02
gave at the very beginning of startup
0:04
school on evaluating startup ideas. And
0:08
the thing to know about both of these
0:10
talks is we've been talking about them
0:13
from the point of view of the investor.
0:15
Basically um it was helpful I thought to
0:20
explain to founders how investors
0:22
evaluate startup ideas and looking at
0:25
that structure so that they can better
0:27
understand their own ideas opportunities
0:30
and then in this presentation present
0:33
them better to the people that they want
0:36
to get excited. So a quick recap in the
0:39
first part I basically say a startup
0:41
idea is a hypothesis for why your
0:43
company is going to grow really quickly.
0:45
That hypothesis must compose of three
0:48
different parts. The problem, the
0:50
solution, and the insight. And the basic
0:52
parts is your problem should be pretty
0:55
big, pretty pervasive, have a lot of
0:57
these characteristics to make it feel
0:58
like there's a very big market that a
1:00
lot of people have the problem. The only
1:02
thing you need to know about the
1:03
solution is that you should not start
1:05
with a technology. you should start with
1:07
a problem. And lastly, you're looking to
1:11
have something that's going to make your
1:12
company unique and have some kind of
1:15
unfair advantage that we call an insight
1:19
that will show why your company will
1:21
grow faster than other companies. I
1:23
talked about five different types of
1:26
unfair advantages that your company can
1:28
have and kind of what are the benchmarks
1:30
for meeting them. Now,
1:33
the thing to keep in mind about
1:36
understanding and creating this startup
1:38
idea is that I don't need you to do all
1:42
the work to lay all of that out in
1:46
detail. That's stuff that you'll kind of
1:47
want to know or keep in mind, but a
1:49
really good investor will do that on
1:51
their own. They'll hear what you're
1:53
talking about and extrapolate. And so,
1:56
what I'm going to cover in this
1:57
presentation is how do you package up
1:59
that hypothesis? How do you take all the
2:00
things that you understand about your
2:02
company and your startup idea and how I
2:04
present it to an investor so that they
2:06
can make an decision that's in your
2:07
favor? This is the YC startup
2:10
application and basically this is the
2:14
application all the questions that we
2:16
ask that YC partners will use to
2:17
evaluate your startup. So down here when
2:21
you're filling out the YC application we
2:23
actually link to a couple of things and
2:26
one of them is how to apply
2:27
successfully.
2:29
I can't tell because I read so many
2:32
applications, but it feels like founders
2:35
are not reading that essay. Uh, it's was
2:39
written by Paul Graham in 2009 and
2:42
almost everything in there still holds
2:44
to this day and people still make
2:46
mistakes from it. So, I'm just going to
2:47
like point out some stuff and really
2:49
like punch it in here while I have your
2:52
attention. So, here's a quote from that
2:54
essay. Basically, we believe for every
2:57
company that we will interview at YC, we
3:01
bet there's probably another company
3:03
that's just as good as them out there,
3:05
but they messed up on the application
3:08
and we didn't realize it. We didn't
3:09
invite them. And basically,
3:13
the reason is because they didn't
3:15
express their idea clearly. That's it.
3:19
Like you might think, oh, I didn't show
3:21
off all that complex stuff about my
3:23
startup idea and that's why they didn't
3:25
pick pick me. And I want you to know
3:27
that's not true. And so the first thing
3:29
I want you to keep in mind is I do not
3:32
need you to sell me as a YC partner,
3:36
right? A good investor, so average
3:38
investor, what they do is they talk to
3:39
you when you tell them about your idea
3:41
and it feels like they're poking holes
3:43
all the questions asked about what's all
3:44
the reasons why this could go wrong. A
3:47
good investor does it the other way
3:48
around. They hear what you say and they
3:50
imagine and they use their optimism and
3:54
they use knowing that some kind of rare
3:57
event has to happen for you to become a
3:58
billion dollar company and they try to
3:59
imagine all those rare events that could
4:01
possibly happen to you. And then they
4:04
pitch that path back to you. And so we
4:08
are really good at selling ourselves. So
4:11
you don't need to do that. And the thing
4:13
is you guys are kind of bad at selling
4:15
things in the beginning, right? And what
4:18
I need you to understand is that I'm
4:20
trying to evaluate these three
4:22
statements when I'm hearing your idea.
4:25
Do I understand it? Am I excited by it?
4:27
Do I like the team? And do I want to
4:29
work with them? Surprise.
4:32
In your weekly updates, when you do your
4:34
group sessions, these are the questions
4:36
that we ask you to ask one another. It's
4:38
basically the questions that we're
4:39
trying to figure out for ourselves. And
4:41
we're hoping that every week when you
4:43
talk with other companies, you were
4:44
practicing getting feedback and
4:47
understanding whether you're able to
4:48
instill this in other people. So your
4:52
goal is just to be clear. I will do
4:55
everything else. So
4:57
back to the application, these are the
5:00
only two things we're going to focus on
5:01
today. What do I put in the what's my
5:04
company going to make? How do I describe
5:06
my company in a very efficient manner?
5:09
The first way to do this is to be clear.
5:12
The reason we focus on this is because a
5:14
clear idea is a foundation for growth.
5:17
And what I mean by that is that the best
5:19
companies in YC or around the world grow
5:24
organically. They grow by word of mouth.
5:27
What does word of mouth look like? It
5:28
looks like this. It's basically I talk
5:31
about your company, what you're doing,
5:32
making, etc., and I'm the most
5:34
interesting person at the dinner table.
5:37
and I tell it to other people and those
5:38
people want to tell other people. That's
5:41
it. Word of mouth is something where I
5:43
remember what you do. I talk about it
5:45
enthusiastic and it spreads on its own.
5:48
Marketing and advertising, it's a tax I
5:51
believe companies pay because they did
5:53
not make something remarkable. Now,
5:55
before anyone can remember at the dinner
5:57
table what you do, they have to
5:59
understand. And so, I have very simple
6:02
rules for how to make things easy to
6:04
understand.
6:06
This will sound familiar if you're
6:08
familiar with an essay I wrote on how to
6:10
design a better pitch deck. And I'm
6:13
gonna focus on basically saying that the
6:17
way I talk about designing a pitch deck
6:19
actually works for ideas and lots of
6:21
other things. And so the way I make
6:22
things easy to understand on a pitch
6:24
deck or a slide is to make it legible. I
6:26
make it simple and I make it obvious. In
6:29
today's presentation, we're just going
6:30
to focus on making your idea legible,
6:34
which is going to sound interesting,
6:36
right, for clarity. Now, in my essay, I
6:39
talked about how at demo day when our
6:43
startups are presenting to a room full
6:45
of a thousand investors. It's kind of an
6:48
interesting audience. Number one, the
6:50
audience is filled with really old
6:51
people.
6:53
They tend to not have very good
6:55
eyesight. As a result, they all can't
6:58
sit in the front row like you lovely
7:00
people. Some of them have to sit in the
7:02
way back and stand up. And that means if
7:05
you create a legible slide, they have to
7:07
be ones that even old people in the back
7:09
row with bad eyesight can read.
7:12
Now, how does that apply to a legible
7:15
idea? Well, basically you are designing
7:18
a slide that democratizes the idea,
7:21
right? And so people who are blind or
7:24
people who are ignorant, you're
7:25
basically designing something for
7:26
everyone in the room, not just the ones
7:29
in the first row. So a legible idea can
7:32
be understood by people who know nothing
7:34
about your business. That will make
7:37
things very clear to the widest possible
7:39
audience. Now this is super important
7:42
because you will talk about your company
7:45
more than anything else. It is actually
7:47
the thing that we are really great at at
7:50
Y Cominator. We have our companies
7:52
constantly practice talking about their
7:55
startup. Startup school curriculum is
7:58
designed around helping you constantly
8:00
practice talking about your startup. And
8:02
this is because you are going to need a
8:05
lot of people if you're going to become
8:07
a billion-dollar company. So you are
8:11
trying to find a co-founder. You have to
8:12
have a way of talking about your company
8:14
clearly.
8:15
Whether you're getting users or
8:17
investors or employees or shareholders,
8:20
you have to get really good at this and
8:22
you have to be able to do it quickly and
8:24
efficiently.
8:25
Here are things to avoid
8:28
that makes things not clear. That makes
8:30
your idea muddy. The first is ambiguity,
8:34
right? So that's like obviously the
8:37
opposite of clear or straightforward.
8:40
Something's a little abstract. Something
8:41
can be interpreted in two ways and
8:43
therefore it might take a question to
8:45
understand what you do. Complexity.
8:49
So I have a very specific definition of
8:51
complexity. And so if you look at the
8:53
root word simple and complex come from
8:57
the same root and having to do with
8:58
twist or braids. Things that are simple
9:01
are ones that are have one braid and
9:03
things that are complex have multiple
9:05
braids. They're intertwined with one
9:07
another. A simple idea is one idea that
9:10
does not fold. A complex idea are ideas
9:13
that are intertwined. So simplicity
9:16
means you are not trying to mix a bunch
9:18
of things in your description.
9:21
Mystery. Um, so this is an odd one, but
9:24
what I mean is anything where it's like
9:27
I'm not going to understand what is
9:29
going on when you're talking about your
9:31
company. Jargon is one obviously. Any
9:34
words that I don't understand. anything
9:35
that's vague like indefinite pronouns.
9:37
So if you just use this, it etc. and you
9:40
don't describe what those nouns are. And
9:42
then things that you just suggest but
9:44
aren't explicit about.
9:46
And the last is ignorable. And so what I
9:49
mean by that is there is some language
9:52
that we will just ignore.
9:54
So in UX design, people will create a
9:58
sort of blindness to things that they
10:00
don't want to look at or they don't find
10:02
to be of important value. So for
10:03
example, ad blindness is a big one that
10:06
people sort of understand. And the thing
10:08
is when you're talking about ideas,
10:10
there's a way of using language that is
10:12
also easily ignorable. Things that just
10:14
won't stick in your head. Things like
10:16
marketing speak, there's probably lots
10:18
of stuff that you heard about that. MBA
10:20
speak, weird kind of like puff yourself
10:23
up talk that doesn't give any extra
10:26
information. And then buzzwords.
10:29
And so when you say certain types of
10:31
words that as an investor I've heard
10:33
over and over again or I will equate
10:35
with zero information or value, then I
10:38
will ignore them. And the result is
10:40
parts of your pitch will end up being
10:43
not even heard by me and therefore I
10:45
will not remember them. What you want to
10:48
do is be conversational.
10:51
A great pitch is one where you can tell
10:52
it to your mom and she gets it. She's
10:54
proud of you,
10:56
right? She's not going to shake her
10:58
head. And that means it's got to be
11:01
conversational. And that's really good
11:03
for word of mouth because we talk in
11:06
normal conversational speak. We don't
11:08
talk like an MBA. We don't talk like
11:10
CEOs all the time. So, it's best to talk
11:13
conversationally.
11:15
Again, avoid jargon, words that are only
11:18
you understood or used by your industry.
11:21
No preamble. We'll have some examples of
11:24
this, but if you want to be clear, let's
11:27
go straight to what you want to talk
11:29
about. Let's not have a winding path to
11:31
eventually getting there. And the last
11:33
one, this one's a big one, is being
11:35
reproducible.
11:36
So, when I hear your idea, can I imagine
11:40
it in my mind? Can I
11:44
see what I would have to build to create
11:46
your company? If I don't have that, then
11:49
I have no picture in my head about what
11:50
your company does. And until I have that
11:53
picture, I can't ask any of the
11:54
questions that helps me understand if
11:56
I'm excited about you or understand
11:59
other nuances of your business.
12:02
To make things reproducible, I need to
12:04
know nouns.
12:06
I need to have objects that I'm going to
12:08
imagine in my head. And there's three
12:10
types of nouns that I should understand
12:12
from your
12:14
startup idea. First one is what are you
12:16
making?
12:18
That should be really clear. what is the
12:20
problem and then who is the customer the
12:24
two are kind of related to the market
12:26
right but I should have these kind of
12:28
three nouns
12:30
in my head so let's go through some
12:34
examples this is
12:37
says we are going to transform the
12:40
relationship between individuals and
12:42
information
12:44
that sucks the thing is we see this all
12:47
the time number one all the nouns that
12:49
you have seated down here are abstract.
12:51
They're ideas. I can't reproduce based
12:54
off of this. Has zeroformational value.
12:58
I still have to ask questions to answer
13:00
the three nouns that I need to have.
13:02
This is a bad description for a company.
13:06
We will see stuff that starts like this
13:08
when we ask describe what your company's
13:09
going to make. I don't even want to read
13:11
it, but basically it starts talking
13:14
about the story of the company or
13:16
basically like in the beginning there
13:19
was this problem and we're going to go
13:21
through this issue, right? And then
13:22
there's these bad guys and they showed
13:24
up, but then who's going to save us?
13:26
We're finally here to save and you're
13:28
like, I have to read another thousand
13:30
applications.
13:31
That's not going to work for me.
13:36
This is the description on the actual
13:37
application that Airbnb put to YC.
13:41
Airbnb is the first online marketplace
13:43
that lets travelers book rooms with
13:45
locals instead of hotels. It's concise.
13:48
It's descriptive. I understand what
13:51
they're building. I have a sense for
13:52
what they're making. And then I can
13:54
start thinking about my other two ideas
13:55
of whether I'm excited about it. And
13:57
then am I going to like this team?
14:00
Here's Dropbox. synchronizes files
14:03
across your or your team's computers.
14:08
The thing about this is it's refreshing,
14:10
but also there's no pretense.
14:13
They don't they aren't playing defense.
14:16
I see a lot of company descriptions
14:18
where they're like, I'm worried about
14:20
this or I've gotten this kind of
14:22
feedback and so they give up clarity to
14:24
make themselves look bigger and blow
14:26
themselves up or make themelves try to
14:28
look more interesting. They're trying to
14:31
protect themselves against something a
14:33
way ahead of time. And the whole problem
14:34
is usually what it ends up doing is it
14:36
brings me farther away from you. All
14:38
that padding that you've put on
14:40
yourself. Here's a description from a
14:42
company in the current batch. Lumini is
14:44
building X-ray vision for soldiers and
14:47
first responders.
14:49
We don't have to go deep into the
14:51
details. I don't need to understand how
14:53
they exactly do this, etc. This
14:58
creates a foundation for my curiosity.
15:01
Now I will start from here to try to
15:03
figure out, oh, how do they do this? Is
15:06
this the right team to do this? How far
15:08
along are they? Do they have traction?
15:11
Do they have customers? I start going
15:12
down the route of asking all the right
15:14
questions based off this one
15:16
description. This is a good one.
15:19
Here's another one. So Vajan in the
15:21
current patch is building LinkedIn for
15:23
the next billion internet users.
15:27
So
15:29
doesn't perfectly connect me to what
15:32
they're sort of making, but I'm
15:34
intrigued. I'm excited about someone
15:36
building into LinkedIn and I know it's
15:38
some kind of social network for business
15:40
people. And so now I'm curious about
15:42
how. I don't need you to answer how in
15:45
the description, but I understand what
15:47
you're doing. And then now I can start
15:49
making questions in my head about like
15:51
how would I evaluate whether this is
15:53
working or successful or promising or
15:55
not? Are this is the right team? Do they
15:57
have a certain amount of traction etc.
15:59
It gets me on the right track. Now
16:01
reason I've used this example is because
16:03
we have a lot of companies who try to
16:05
use the X for Y. And what I mean by that
16:10
is like LinkedIn for whatever or Uber
16:12
for blank or Airbnb for blank. And so
16:15
that X for Y is super useful because it
16:18
allows you to shortcut business model
16:21
and some kind of complex behavior,
16:23
right? And then attach it to some other
16:25
vertical or something that you're trying
16:26
to make work.
16:29
X or Y is okay, but most people abuse it
16:34
or do it incorrectly. So I'm going to
16:35
give you some tips. First, should you
16:38
use X for Y? Uh sorry for the
16:40
legibility. Uh number one, is X a
16:43
household name? This should be like a
16:45
billion-dollar company, right? You can't
16:48
use uh your uncle's like pet shoe store
16:52
as the X for this because people don't
16:55
know your uncle's pet shoe store and
16:56
they don't know if it's successful or
16:57
not, right? So, everyone as many people
17:01
should know about this as possible and
17:02
for an investor, it should be clear that
17:04
it's a billion-doll company or
17:06
opportunity.
17:08
Everyone has to agree that it is
17:10
successful. So, you could have a really
17:12
big X. Everyone knows about it, but it's
17:14
infamous, right? So, like people don't
17:17
think it's successful. So, be careful of
17:19
that. Does Y want X? So, is it really
17:24
clear
17:26
why the target that you're going after
17:29
wants this kind of model applied to it,
17:32
this kind of solution applied to it,
17:34
whether it's Airbnb 4 or Airbnb or Uber
17:38
for, etc., It should be really clear
17:40
that that's a segment that's either
17:41
missing it, it's not being served well
17:44
by the other one and also that those
17:46
people want to have that kind of model.
17:50
And then the third one is why should be
17:52
a huge market. So if you're building
17:56
uh X for Y and then the last part
18:00
doesn't sound like a really big
18:02
business, that's not going to work well
18:03
for you, right? Because what we want
18:06
because you're essentially saying that
18:08
you are something but it's a subset and
18:11
what we want to make sure is that subset
18:13
feels like it could be really really
18:15
big. If you choose a subset that sounds
18:17
like it's going to be really really
18:18
small investors won't be as interested.
18:20
It doesn't me it means that I'm worried
18:22
that you will not have enough potential
18:26
headroom to grow to become a billion
18:28
dollar company. So here's an example
18:30
that doesn't work. So, we had a company
18:33
in the batch that started off by
18:34
describing themselves as Buffer for
18:36
Snapchat. Buffer is a nice company, but
18:40
definitely smaller than Snapchat.
18:44
So, don't want to do that. All right.
18:47
So, basic summary for this section, lead
18:50
with what,
18:52
not, why, or how. You don't need all
18:54
that other stuff. That stuff gets in the
18:57
way of your clarity for the most part.
19:00
I'll read like a thousand applications
19:02
every single batch and it's a really
19:05
hard thing to do. Basically, even though
19:07
it's my job, it's really really
19:10
difficult to have that much focus and
19:12
attention across all these different
19:14
applications.
19:16
So, I need some empathy. I need you to
19:19
help me out. And what we want is that
19:22
when I bring up your application and I'm
19:23
looking at it, let's make our intimate
19:25
time really pleasurable, right? Let's
19:28
make the time that I spend on an idea
19:30
very efficient. I'll look at it. I'll
19:32
understand really clearly. I'll move
19:34
around your application and be like,
19:36
"Oh, I'm kind of excited. Maybe there's
19:37
going to have this." And I'll look at
19:38
that part and like, "Oh, they do have
19:40
it. That sounds awesome." Oh, what about
19:42
this? Oh, that sounds awesome, too. What
19:45
we don't want is me to go like, "I don't
19:47
know what what are they talking about."
19:50
Then I have to like go to your website.
19:52
I'm like, don't know what they're
19:54
talking about. I don't know how this
19:56
sort of works. I go back to it. I try to
19:58
figure something else out. I try to see
19:59
if like some other partner might
20:01
understand what you're doing, etc. Super
20:03
inefficient.
20:06
Where is there going to be room for me
20:07
to get excited as a result? So to be
20:10
efficient, we need to be concise.
20:12
Concise. The best way
20:16
I want to keep this in mind is to use
20:18
some examples. And so uh here's some
20:21
things I need you to keep in mind. Yes,
20:23
I want you to be concise. Use as few
20:25
words as possible. And what I want you
20:28
to understand is the concision is
20:31
actually gives me secondary information
20:35
about you as a team. It lets me one know
20:39
that you have thought deeply about your
20:41
idea. Because you've thought so deeply
20:43
about it and because you've practiced
20:45
talking about it so much and you've
20:47
gotten really good at getting people
20:48
excited and understanding your thing
20:49
really quickly, you probably have
20:51
figured out how to do it in a short
20:52
amount of time.
20:54
So, it lets me know that this is a
20:56
founder that has thought deeply about
20:57
the idea. The other thing about being
21:00
concise, it shows me that you are
21:02
efficient. And if you're efficient with
21:04
your words, then you're probably
21:06
efficient with your thoughts. And that
21:07
means you're probably also efficient
21:09
with your actions. And what that means
21:11
is that I will start to believe that you
21:14
understand what is most important about
21:15
your business. You understand
21:17
communicate it clearly. and you might
21:18
actually know how to always figure out
21:22
the most important part of what to do
21:24
about your company to make it grow, to
21:26
make it work, etc.
21:28
So, there's a minimum stuff that we want
21:31
to have even though we're trying to be
21:32
as concise as possible. Again, I want to
21:34
understand the nouns. So, if we're so
21:36
concise that I can't understand these,
21:39
then your concision is too much. The
21:42
other is I want to get to this point
21:46
when I read the decision or this short
21:49
version of whatever it is you're talking
21:51
about because again I know there's like
21:53
a hundred,000 reasons why your company
21:55
is great but when I'm reading your
21:57
application I'm only going to maybe
21:59
remember two to three of them and so we
22:02
have to try to make sure those most
22:04
important ones come up to the top. This
22:07
is a real startup school company
22:09
description.
22:11
It's an online e-commerce store.
22:14
I can picture what it is, but again,
22:16
it's not a description that helps me get
22:18
excited about it. It doesn't help me
22:20
lead to all the other things. I have to
22:22
do now more work to understand why this
22:24
is fast growing and it potential. I also
22:28
don't know based on this some nouns. I
22:30
don't know exactly who the customer is.
22:33
Is it people that they're selling stuff
22:34
to or are they making an e-commerce
22:36
store for other shop owners? Just
22:38
ambiguity.
22:40
IT security services.
22:42
This is most of the descriptions that we
22:44
see on startup school. It makes it
22:47
really really hard for us to understand
22:48
it.
22:50
A meritocratic decision support system.
22:53
The thing is I want to know for what?
22:56
For whom? I don't even understand what
22:58
the problem is that they're solving
22:59
based off of this. And so
23:02
is it for is it because a lot of people
23:04
have non-mar basically I have to ask so
23:06
many questions in my head to figure out
23:08
why did they get to this sort of
23:09
description
23:11
learn and sharing knowledge about data
23:13
science and artificial intelligence
23:15
sounds more like a mission I can't tell
23:17
what the product is
23:19
and how they're going to go about it
23:21
like I couldn't reproduce this if I had
23:23
10 companies
23:25
build based off this description you'd
23:26
have 10 very different products the
23:29
other thing that's odd about company
23:30
descriptions is you guys tend to
23:33
capitalize and make proper nouns very
23:36
weird words and phrases. You should not
23:38
do that. It's not like a magazine title.
23:41
Um, and it makes me think sometimes
23:43
you're emphasizing the wrong things like
23:45
you're thinking the data science and
23:46
artificial intelligence is a thing
23:48
that's going to make me excited. And the
23:49
thing is like those are the buzzwords.
23:51
Those are the solutions and it makes me
23:53
worried that you haven't started with a
23:54
problem.
23:57
Let's go an example of like how to
23:59
adjust a description. So here's a much
24:02
longer one. So our company will make
24:04
lowcost and low power consumption
24:06
medical devices based on artificial
24:08
intelligent and IoT suitable for
24:11
subsaharan communities. Now relatively
24:15
clear I could understand it reading it
24:17
but it's not the most concise form of
24:20
this and I feel like there's a lot of
24:21
things get in the way. And so when I
24:23
work with companies to help shrink and
24:25
reduce and improve their descriptions so
24:28
that I will get the most out of it, um I
24:32
want to talk through the process. The
24:33
first thing I want to do is just figure
24:35
out what are the nouns in the
24:37
description. Here we go. Our company
24:40
medical devices for subsum communities.
24:42
Oh we're almost done.
24:45
Right.
24:48
everything else that gets added on here,
24:50
whatever verb, adjectives or adverbs you
24:52
want, you want to be really careful. You
24:54
want to know like is it giving maximum
24:56
punch for this, right? And so
25:00
really the verb is going to be usually
25:03
just you're making something, etc. Um,
25:07
but usually it's going to be whatever
25:09
the product like the verb is like the
25:10
thing that we're making. If we're
25:12
thinking about this in an active voice
25:14
structure, the subject, the verb, and
25:17
then the object, the customer, the
25:19
market, the people we're going after,
25:21
everything else, if we add anything back
25:23
to this, I really want to be really
25:24
careful about why we're going to add
25:26
back to it. Is that going to be the
25:28
stuff that makes it me excited? So, the
25:30
artificial intelligence IoT suitable
25:32
stuff, that's like how they're wanting
25:35
it, the technology, and I'm more worried
25:37
that they're wanting to use buzzwords to
25:39
describe it, right? Hopefully that's
25:41
like a secret weapon that you have, but
25:42
I bet it's not the defining
25:44
characteristics of whether this company
25:45
is successful or not. And then up here,
25:47
I see two modifiers for medical devices.
25:50
Low cost, low power consumption. So low
25:53
cost, I can definitely see that's super
25:55
interesting. If you make a lowcost
25:57
device in subsaharan community then I'm
26:00
like oh that's interest that's really
26:01
interesting because that's like it's
26:02
hard just to make something you know for
26:05
developing countries but to make it so
26:07
it's actually affordable for them that'd
26:09
be interesting the low power consumption
26:12
I can give or take there I'd have to
26:14
know more about the company to know
26:15
whether that's actually crucial to
26:17
understanding whether this company has
26:18
an unfair advantage or not so if I was
26:21
to redo this come out to recreate
26:24
affordable medical devices for
26:25
subsaharan Africa. Some people are going
26:28
to be very squeamish about this. A lot
26:30
of founders are worried. It's like,
26:32
you're putting me in a box, man. It's
26:34
too reductive.
26:37
My business is complex.
26:39
I do a lot of things and a lot of things
26:43
make me great. I want to tell you all of
26:45
them. And the thing is like you don't
26:47
have time. And I know it as an investor.
26:50
There's no investor that thinks any
26:52
business is like simple and easy. I just
26:55
don't think that from the default. So,
26:57
you shouldn't be worried that I'm going
26:59
to think something small of it. And
27:01
again, you want to be careful of the
27:03
defense on here. Once I get to this,
27:05
then I'll start asking the other
27:07
questions. It creates that foundation
27:08
for curiosity.
27:11
All right, we're pretty much here at the
27:12
end. The best way to help me, and I
27:15
would love for you to help me,
27:18
is to be clear and concise.
27:22
Thank you very much.
27:27
[Music]
27:29
[Applause]